Wikipedia’s Jimmy Wales: What Wikipedia is really about – #istrategy (1 of 6)

On October 26, I attended the IStrategy conference which took place in Amsterdam. I was there to deliver a keynote on social media are ROI/ROE, but I must confess I also attended the conference in order to listen to Jimmy Wales who gave us an overview of his celebrated online encyclopaedia: Wikipedia. I was there in the front row, with my notebook in my lap. Here is the account of Jimmy Wales’s most impressive presentation, a good means of taking a bit of hindsight and LAN learning to know better a collaborative website which everyone uses but few have in-depth knowledge about.

 

to gather all the parts of this post together, just type: http://bit.ly/walesvm2!

[photo by YAG: Jimmy Wales on stage at iStrategy in Amsterdam on October 26]

who is using Wikipedia?

Was Jimmy Wales introductory question to the audience and not surprisingly, everyone raised their hands. “who has edited Wikipedia?” Was question number two and a couple of dozen delegates raised their hands this time, which shows that the audience was really upmarket. It also demonstrates a known fact, i.e. that only a fraction of users are content producers, and that most of them are content with the ability to look at others users’ entries.

no free beer

Wikipedia is “based on the concept of free software” Jimmy Wales went on. But free, in that instance, doesn’t mean that it’s free in “the free beer sense of the term” he added. What it really means, he explained, is that “everything that goes into Wikipedia can be reused and redistributed, repurposed for all kinds of things, namely the translation into a number of languages”.

what Wikipedia is … and isn’t about

Wikipedia is meant to be “the sum of all human knowledge”. A somewhat bombastic boast I would say, for there are instances in which, the online encyclopaedia is delivering false information; this should not be forgotten, even though – like me – one really dotes on the project, the crosschecking of information is a necessary and unavoidable process.

Regardless, what Jimmy Wales was hinting at was that the purpose of the online collaborative project is to collect information on Hamlet for instance, not to be a repository of everything regarding Hamlet, let alone to “keep a copy of Hamlet” he said. It’s about describing and debating Hamlet… and other subjects.

in comes Wikia

At the end of his introduction, Jimmy announced that the Wikimedia foundation (i.e. the non-profit organisation he is heading) has launched a new project which caters for those wanting to debate Hamlet, and other subject, on and on and on. This new project is called Wikia. But before we delve into this new venture, I remember that Jimmy Wales gave us an overview of Wikipedia and how it’s being used worldwide; this will be the subject of a few other posts on this blog… Stay tuned!

Follow me

Yann Gourvennec

CEO & Founder at Visionary Marketing
Yann has a long-standing experience in marketing, information systems and Web marketing. He created visionarymarketing.com in 1996 and since then, he has practiced Web strategy, e-business and Web communications in the field. He was a member of socialmedia.org from 2008 till 2013. He is a lecturer, a keynote speaker, an author and blogger. In early 2014, he went from intrapreneur to entrepreneur when he founded his digital marketing agency Visionary Marketing.
Yann Gourvennec
Follow me

4 thoughts on “Wikipedia’s Jimmy Wales: What Wikipedia is really about – #istrategy (1 of 6)

  1. Yann, you’re right, Wikipedia is free but not as free as a free beer. So my question is: will Wikipedia always remain free? What is the future of Wikipedia in 10, 20, 50 years? Should Jimmy Wales die, who will take the leadership? This is a serious question, because I personally think Wikipedia should be part of the “patrimoine humain”, something under Unesco or something else responsibility.

    1. My! that’s a serious question. I suppose it applies to any previous piece of work on the same subject (Britannica, Encyclopeida Universalis etc.) except that in this case this is free content hence anyone can repurpose it and own the project after Jimmy is gone. Having said that, he is still a young man.

  2. Yann, you’re right, Wikipedia is free but not as free as a free beer. So my question is: will Wikipedia always remain free? What is the future of Wikipedia in 10, 20, 50 years? Should Jimmy Wales die, who will take the leadership? This is a serious question, because I personally think Wikipedia should be part of the “patrimoine humain”, something under Unesco or something else responsibility.

    1. My! that’s a serious question. I suppose it applies to any previous piece of work on the same subject (Britannica, Encyclopeida Universalis etc.) except that in this case this is free content hence anyone can repurpose it and own the project after Jimmy is gone. Having said that, he is still a young man.

Comments are closed.