| Accueil Français | Contact | About me |

Marketing Strategy Marketing 2.0 Web 2.0
 
 

Little by little, informal networks are becoming mainstream. Ubiquitous Internet access is also making networking more important every day. Beyond our ever increasing fascination for informal networks, one may still rightfully wonder whether networking is something new or a fad or even something which always existed and is key to human beings living in congregations

 

 Home | Texts | Articles | Free Book | Archives | LinksNewsletterBlog |

 

 Site Search & Newsletter

  OF NETWORKS AND MEN (PART II)  
   
 

II a_ Man designs the technology which changes man

Do technical innovations have an impact on social behaviour, or is it the other way round? Probably both at the same time. When Vannevar Bush[8] wrote his trail-blazing article on dynamic associations  in 1945, he created the concept of hypertext and eventually, he paved the way for Berners Lee’s invention of the world-wide web as we know it.

Bush’s idea was not about the creation of yet another technological gizmo, it was about knowledge and how to access information differently. It was about how to access greater portions of knowledge, faster and how to improve our understanding through better access to knowledge bases.

  Of Networks and Men
Can solidarity prove more useful than Corporate processes?
 
   

Keyword

 

 

E-mail 
     
   

At the end of the day, what hypertext made possible is the development of information networks, which matches the ever-increasing requirement of humans to learn more, to know more and know better in a world where the surfeit of information sources is obvious. This very surfeit of information is what drove Vannevar Bush to write “As we may think”.

 
 

But the desire of humans to access more information in a better way is not limited to Internet usage. TV channel-switching and the five-minute maximum attention span are taught to our kids from a very early age through TV programmes and computer games[9] (often designed like hypertext documents with secret passages and hidden links to other parts of the game) (see Figure 3 ).

 

Figure 3 : Information networks as a result of hypertext implementation. Hypertext is an enabler for a different kind of access to knowledge.

  Figure 3 : Information networks as a result of hypertext implementation. Hypertext is an enabler for a different kind of access to knowledge.

A marketing researcher recently told me too that he was in the process of reconsidering the way that he was writing his books: ‘People no longer want to read books from page 1 to page 250. What today’s readers want is books to which they can refer when they want to, and which they can start reading from any page’. It is because of this change in behaviour, because people want to access information in that way that those in charge of delivering and packaging contents have resorted to these new tools.Conversely, it is also because people are getting increasingly familiar with that sort of information lay-out, namely through search-engines, that they are looking more and more for other information sources than Internet-based ones to be structured in that way too. The classic hierarchical structure for information presentation is less natural but certainly more consistent with traditional school teaching. But it is also appearing less and less attractive to users and readers who managed to get used to the new way of presenting and collecting information over time. As a result, the apparent chaos generated by hypertext is something that most users and readers have gotten used to, and even have grown to like a lot.

II b- The house of leaves or the advent of hypertext literature

   

Figure 4: The House of Leaves is a postmodern ‘hypertext’ novel with a zest.

  Figure 4: The House of Leaves is a postmodern ‘hypertext’ novel with a zest.

Amongst the world’s most recent experiments on the extension of the hypertext concept to literature, Mark Z. Danielewski’s best selling novel The House of Leaves ranks very high indeed[10]. In this novel, Danielewski does not tell a proper story or at least not in a linear, traditional way. Originally he did not even sign the book with his narration behind two pseudo and somewhat unlikely writers: Zampano and Johnny Truant. Instead, the Canadian author designed a very complex labyrinthine novel, which seems to aim at losing the reader, at least in appearance.

This book is a living example of what we exposed earlier on but at the same time, it is also a good example of the limitations of the hypertext concept which after all is not very well suited to paper-based novels.

 

 

 
 

[8] Read Guy Teasdale’s history of hypertext at http://www.ebsi.umontreal.ca/cursus/volinoi/teasdale.html#5. Bush’s original text was entitled: “As we may think”.

[9] Probably a natural tendency but reinforced by TV programs and computer games designers.

[10] The House of Leaves is a story told by two pseudo narrators (Zampano and Johnny Truant). Cp http://www.themodernword.com/borges/borges_infl_danielewski.html and http://www.houseofleaves.com/forums/index.php for an explanation and critique of this book. Refer to http://sonyalynne.net/essay/cressay.htm for an essay on experimental postmodern literature by Sonya Hagler (2003). 

 

 

 

F E E D B A C K
The European CRM  portal
Le Webring du Marketing

 

 Home | Texts | Articles | Free Book | Archives | Links | Newsletter |

       

Copyright © 1996-2005 Visionarymarketing.com Yann A Gourvennec

Template designed by Holden-vs-Ford.com © 2002