| |
As seen in Figure 32, the preliminary work on basic assumptions
is fundamental and crucial if you wish to be able to take this
process to completion. At the same time, working on the common
vision is key to building the future strategy for your business.
Vision will highlight what you think you are, where you think
you want to go and it will determine everything you endeavour
in order to get there. The strategic assessment questionnaire
is aimed at clarifying the vision of today’s reality that the
organisation’s main decision makers have formed. It also helps
assess whether this vision is shared and consistent as well as
it enables one to freeze the basic assumptions, which will condition
the rest of the strategic assessment process. This questionnaire
consists of an approximately 40-question slideshow and is self-administered
by the board members who will have been gathered around the same
table.
Approximately 15 minutes will be necessary to fill in the questionnaire.
Subsequently, fifteen minutes will be devoted to the realtime
analysis of the results, preferably during the coffee-break. A
30-minute debrief session will ensue, whereby this analysis and
thoughts will be shared with the management team. This strategic
assessment questionnaire is called ‘a projective’ questionnaire,
i.e. where respondents project their inner thoughts and commit
them to paper. It is a very convenient trick, which can be used
to reveal what managers really think and compare visions and end
up with – a more or less – common vision of reality and future
goals. At any rate, the projective questionnaire option enables
ICT marketeers to gain a clear understanding of valid strategic
assumptions and also hints on how sustainable management backup
could be obtained. In actual fact, this questionnaire does not
serve the usual purpose of neutrality as normal surveys do. Its
aim is somewhat different. It is aimed at Board members primarily,
but one could decide to use it on much wider populations.
The questionnaire has to be filled out during sessions within
the given deadline. No conferring is allowed. This will help preserve
spontaneity. Most of the questions have to be biased: Asking respondents
to take sides for one or several strategic options may mean that
they have to choose between extremes. This process will enable
the reproduction of the context relative to the decision-making
process. Respondents will be asked to give their opinion now and
in the future and they have to fill-in the questionnaire without
giving their names. Opinions expressed will have to be personal
as opposed to the personal understanding of a global vision. Sometimes
only one choice will be possible, even though respondents would
find it more convenient to keep their options open. This will
force them to make real choices, as is required when making strategic
decisions in real life.
|
|